June 2, 2012

May 24, 2012
Hellloooooo. I’m new to FYSR, so I’ll introduce myself. My name is Tara (you can find me here and here . I’m a Film and Literature double major at Bard and I’m shooting my film senior project this summer and writing my literature senior project (more relevant to this site) on Jane Austen’s Persuasion.

Cool, cool cool cool.

The new The Great Gatsby trailer  came out yesterday. Watching it, I realized how little I remembered about the novel. The last time I read it was at summer camp (nerd camp) at Duke TIP in 2007 (lolz, I know).

ANYWAY, TGG jumped up past all of the Jane Austen research I should be doing (like, 15 books from the lib or whatever) to the top of my summer reading list.

Hellloooooo. I’m new to FYSR, so I’ll introduce myself. My name is Tara (you can find me here and here . I’m a Film and Literature double major at Bard and I’m shooting my film senior project this summer and writing my literature senior project (more relevant to this site) on Jane Austen’s Persuasion.

Cool, cool cool cool.

The new The Great Gatsby trailer came out yesterday. Watching it, I realized how little I remembered about the novel. The last time I read it was at summer camp (nerd camp) at Duke TIP in 2007 (lolz, I know).

ANYWAY, TGG jumped up past all of the Jane Austen research I should be doing (like, 15 books from the lib or whatever) to the top of my summer reading list.

May 18, 2012
Watch out world, FYSR is back June 1.

Interested in contributing? Just shoot me your email address, and I’d be happy to send you an invite. 

August 14, 2011
W.H. Auden’s City Without Walls

It occurs to me that I didn’t ever write about W.H. Auden’s book of poetry, City Without Walls, named after the opening poem, which is brilliant but with a voice that sharply differs from the other poems published alongside it. I read the book quite a while ago, an have since returned it to the library, so this should be a relatively short post, reconstructed from some of the notes I wrote on it, notes which I, until moments ago, thought I’d left stuck in the book when returning it.

W.H. Auden, of course, is one of the most prominent 20th century poets, and needs little introduction. I’d enjoyed quite a few of his poems individual over the last few years, Musée des Beaux Arts was one of the first poems that I read that really resonated with me, for whatever reason. Auden was born in England but lived much of his life in America, and his mixture of national voices comes across reasonably well in his work, rarely overstating itself or crossing the line into hamfisted. 

I’d say that about 60% of the poems were very good, with the remainder ranging from unremarkable to the edges of dullness. Auden’s verse (and my memory here is especially blurry) is excellent and meticulously constructed much of the time. But Auden falls short when he attempts to straddle the divide between his most traditional earlier work and the new modernist poetry that had gripped the US over the decade and a half before this book was published. The poems were written between 1965 and 1968 (Except for the Brecht translations, which were obviously written much earlier and translated in this period), and some seems to be a product of Auden’s struggle to keep pace with these changing modes of poetry, and many of his attempts are at times sonically ugly at worst, or at best seem like unfinished experiments not ready for publication.

But Auden generally has a keen ear for sound elements, but keeps it in check. The result is poems that are equally well suited for silent reading as well as vocal performance. Overall, reading this book poked some holes in my admiration of Auden, but also strengthened my opinion of him. No artist creates only masterpieces, and seeing a poet struggle and fail can sometimes improve your appreciation of the times when they get it just right.

(Disclaimer: What the hell do I know about poetry?)

August 5, 2011

lifeasaqueen asked: You just gave me a great book to read. Thanks! :)

You’re welcome! : )

August 5, 2011
Currently Reading

Currently Reading

July 29, 2011

misterchu asked: Yes. Mister Levi. If you have not tried 'Moments of Reprieve', do consider it. Mister Chu thinks you will find it to be worth your time.

Be well.

We will.

Sorry for the lack of posts— back soon.

July 14, 2011

I had plans to venture boldly into reading many lengthy novels by authors I’d never read before, including Infinite Jest and Tess of the d’Urbervilles—and I still do. But I started reading Kleinzeit, my second Russell Hoban novel of the summer, yesterday. No regrets yet: I love it.

July 12, 2011
(I guess everything else on my reading list is moving down a 965-page notch.)

(I guess everything else on my reading list is moving down a 965-page notch.)

July 3, 2011
Leviathan, Philip Hoare

Anyone who knows me well probably knows that I am slightly fanatical on the subject of Herman Melville, especially when it comes to Moby-Dick. This led me to read Philip Hoare’s book Leviathan. As you might guess from the title, it’s about whales, mostly. Hoare is an obsessive, unrepentant Melvillian, and the book is essentially a log of his fascination with Moby-Dick, and, from it, whales and the history of humans’ interactions with them.

At its best, especially in the descriptions of the history of whales and whaling, the book is something like an extended footnote to Moby-Dick. is finally uneven because Hoare’s digressions aren’t as interesting as Melville’s (or rather Ishmael’s). The more personal parts of the book—the description of Hoare’s childhood in coastal England, of his mother’s death and of his travels to research whales—sometimes work effectively to tie the book together, but also at times seems to drag on to no particular purpose.

Most interesting about Leviathan is the sheer amount of information in it. It’s particularly exciting to encounter if you’ve ever read Moby-Dick and wondered how much of it has roots in fact. (And honestly, if you haven’t read Moby-Dick, you probably won’t read Hoare’s book.) Hoare brings in a huge amount of bizarre facts and stories about whales: from recent discoveries that arctic whales may live for well over a hundred years, to inexplicable (and inexplicably creepy) nineteenth-century accounts of sea serpents fighting sperm whales, to harrowing descriptions of twentieth-century whaling. Given this, it’s particularly annoying that Leviathan is almost infuriatingly non-academic. It has no citations, no index and only a limited bibliography. This means that it’s impossible to find the sources for any of the fascinating things Hoare mentions, or to find them again in the book after you’ve read it.

As a footnote to Moby-Dick it fills in many gaps and then leaves you trying to fill more of them yourself. Which is alright, but not exactly ideal. And even Melville used footnotes.